Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Roman Empire and Risk - 1084 Words

Did you ever think that a simple board game like Risk could relate to something as supreme and substantial as the Roman Republic? The board game Risk is a strategic, turn-based game in which players try to expand their empire and dominate the world. Players hope to gain power by conquering territories and by strengthening their army. To gain land, participants of the game must roll dice and score higher than the defender of the territory. Many times, territory is fought over, but other times the land is too strong to be conquered. Strategies are used to help fortify, expand and protect empires. The Roman Republic (509 B.C. - 27 B.C) was extremely powerful due to a large, strong army with lots of territory. Rome started off as a small city†¦show more content†¦3). This included major empires such as Egypt, Persia, Syria, Carthage and Greece (Fisher, par. 3). Furthermore, the Romans expanded into Celt territories to the north and west, â€Å"while also pushing back Germanic p eoples in the north† (Fisher, par. 3). Also, the Roman army fought a ten year struggle to control the Etruscan city of Veii (Gill, par. 9). Every territory the Romans conquered, power and wealth increased majorly. In the end, conquering land is the major objective of Risk; similarly the Roman Republic made this their overall goal in which they successfully achieved. In the game of Risk, strategizing is the key to winning. There is an abundance of diverse strategies, but some work better than others. Deploying a large amount of force on border territories to impede invasion is a common strategy that is very effective. Opponents will not be able to conquer this territory, which will allow the player to then switch to offense. Another strategy that is often used is aggression or invasion with force and belligerence. In addition, players will frequently surround pieces of land, in hope that the inside will collapse. The most popular strategy is definitely alliance. An alliance is when a group of empires form an association for mutual benefit. Furthermore, this could help both empires in invading and defending. For example, a player could agree to defend another player’s territory if that person agrees toShow MoreRelatedThe Roman And Roman Empire1068 Words   |  5 PagesThe Roman Empire, which was centered in the city of Rome, was the most extensive western civilization of ancient times. With its major advancements and prosperity it is hard to believe that the Roman Empire suddenly collapsed and fell into a time known as the Dark Ages. After a period of struggles for the Roman Empire, the empire gradually fell. Rome was the most successful civilization of its time. Its strategic location in the center of the Italian Peninsula and the fertile plains that supportedRead MoreEssay about The Fall of the Roman Empire1385 Words   |  6 PagesThe Fall of the Roman Empire Rome was a major power because it always made certain its own military prowess was preeminent. There have been many ideas presented as to the fall of the Roman Empire. Many believe that Rome declined morally and the violence and decadence of the societal norms led to the demise. Gibbons has been credited with the theory of the influence and transference of Christianity over the Roman system of Gods and Goddesses that perpetrated the fall. AnotherRead MoreChanges and continuities of Roman empire1432 Words   |  6 Pages Between 500 BCE and 500 CE, the Roman civilization experienced changes both politically and culturally. Firstly, Rome’s government transitioned from a Republic to an Empire. Later, that empire was split into two parts; east and west. In terms of changes in culture, it was impacted by the shift in religion, as the Romans shifted from polytheism to monotheism. Despite all the changes, Rome still remained culturally diverse. The Romans overthrew the Etruscans in 509 B.C.E. The EtruscansRead MoreRise Of Christianity : Christianity1456 Words   |  6 Pagescrucified by the Romans. His life, works, death, and resurrection is what started Christianity. But that wasn’t the end of it. Christians would face numerous trials and persecution before Christianity would become the official religion of the Roman Empire, courtesy of Theodosius I. Wait, didn’t the Romans first persecute the Christians? What happened? The factors that happened within the Roman Empire that eventually led to Christianity becoming the official religion were the Roman problems and ChristianRead MoreThe Fall Of The Roman Empire1537 Words   |  7 PagesAncient Rome was an empire so dominant, wealthy and economically- stable which came to a dramatic fall in the period of 250AD- 500AD. Ancient Rome faced unexplained unfortunate events which crumbled the Great Empire from the affluent empire to a impoverished society. For centuries historians have timelessly theorised and analysed many debates and research in relation to the Fall of the Roman Empire. What really caused the predominate Roman Empire to fall? Did Rome fall naturally? Was disease, suchRead MoreThe Roman Medicine991 Words   |  4 Pagessana in corpore sano† (Juvenal 10.356). A healthy mind in a healthy body, the Ancient Romans lived by this motto. The Ancient Romans believed that the health of the people was key to success in war and in creating a prosperous empire. Roman texts that have been gathered overtime have greatly influenced modern medical practices and without them, modern medicine would not be as advanced as it is today. The Ancient Romans learned numerous details about the human body and applied their knowledge in waysRead MorePax Roman A Time Of Peace And Learning1459 Words   |  6 Pagestime of peace, the Romans greatly expanded their commerce and also refine their art. With peace, the romans spent less time f ocusing on war and more time focusing on the arts. History remembers the legendary Roman legions as the one of the most deadly and successful fighting forces in the ancient world. Even today, stories of their great success and invincibility in the face of their enemies are still known. At the height of their empire, the Romans were able to conquer a vast empire that stretched overRead MoreRoman Empire1559 Words   |  7 PagesGreek and Roman financiers: from the 4th century BC Banking activities in Greece are more varied and sophisticated than in any previous society. Private entrepreneurs, as well as temples and public bodies, now undertake financial transactions. They take deposits, make loans, change money from one currency to another and test coins for weight and purity. They even engage in book transactions. Moneylenders can be found who will accept payment in one Greek city and arrange for credit in anotherRead MoreJulius Caesar: Conqueror, General, Builder, Dictator for Life755 Words   |  4 Pages Julius Caesar, an important figure in Roman history, lived during the end of the Roman Republic. His actions would shape the world around him forever. He was an important figure because he grew the Roman Empire, he brought about the end of the Roman Republic , and was able to grow his status within his lifetime and become dictator for life. Julius Caesar was born on July 12 , 100 BC and died on March 15, 44 BC. Caesar was born into a patrician family. This meant that they were noble andRead MoreMedieval And Millennial - A Pilgrimage Of Meaning1386 Words   |  6 PagesDuring this time, there was an influential emperor who touch much of Europe with a renewing hand. Emperor Charlemagne built an empire embodied with the mission to unify the people, attempting to create one European religion and convert pagan tribes to Christianity. Europe needed a revival in his eyes and so he set out to promote education and literacy. Charlemagne’s empire created religious unity throughout Europe through architecture, music, and literature which brought meaning to his life; today

Anomie free essay sample

The Development of Anomie In 1893 Emile Durkheim presented the concept of anomie which means that if society lacks social norms or was left unregulated it would tend towards deviant behaviour. For Durkheim crime and deviant behaviour was integral to society in that it set social and moral boundaries and brought about a sense of community. Whilst we wish to expand further on the mentioned ideas we will also focus on how these ideas have influenced other theories of deviance and crime. We shall focus our discussion on Robert K. Mertons development of anomie and more specifically we will look at his ork on Strain Theory. Durkheims work on The Division of Labour (1893) suggested that there are two concepts of society: mechanical and organic, it is also noted that society evolves from one state to another. It begins in a simple state which he termed mechanical, where people act and think alike. They all perform similar tasks and there are no individualistic goals simply group goals, for example a country ruled by dictator regime. This simple society evolves into something far more complex called organic where there are less social bonds and individuals begin to think as ndividuals and are no longer tied to the mob mentality. Therefore Anomie occurs when there is a breakdown of social norms. This results in individuals being lost or unable to fit into in society without having a clear set of rules to adhere to. The sudden change in society can lead to conflict and deviance. For instance during economic depression crime and deviance increases as people no longer have a dole within society, this may be due to redundancy or pay cuts. In 1938 American sociologist Robert K. Merton used Durkheims concept of anomie to form his own theory of deviance, Strain Theory. It differs greatly from Durkheims original concept in two specific ways, Merton thought that the problem was not brought about by a sudden change in society, as Durkheim suggested, but it was actually due to a structure within society. It was suggested that this structure presented each member society with the same goals however did not offer them equal means by which to achieve the goals. Merton observes that it is possible to overemphasise either the goals or the means to achieve them and it is which leads to social strains or anomie. (Burke 2010:43). Durkheim suggested that an individuals goals were oundless however Merton countered this suggestion with the notion that anomie is derived from the strains within the social structure therefore forces the individual to have unachievable goals. Among the elements of social and cultural structure, two are important for our purposes The first consists of culturally defined goals, purposes, and interests. It comprises a frame of aspirational reference The second phase of the social structure defines, regulates, and controls the acceptable modes of achieving these goals. (Merton, 1938:672-673) Mertons theory is based on the American society and in particular the American ream as such the goals and culture described above are best understood with the American dream in mind. It is the American Dream that everyone, regardless of class origin, religion, or ethnic characteristics can succeed in acquiring material that during the founding of the New World that an open society would be created a nd in turn it was expected that everyone would be equal. However it was seen that money was the same where ever they were, whether it was Old Money or New Money. Therefore each individual, even though they aspired to riches, they would ultimately have to work hard to achieve that goal. However, although it is seen that the American Dream is assimilated with cultural goals, the means to achieve such goals, or institutionalized means, are not necessarily spread evenly through society. For example not everybody can access higher or university education within the I-JK because of the significant cost it entails. This therefore becomes a hindrance in achieving success as the individual is lacking the institutional means required to move forward. Success in society is rewarded by materialistic things therefore a sense of worthlessness and despair will emanate amongst those individuals who feel hey are, or are deemed to be, unsuccessful. It is with this that we can really grasp Mertons idea of strain between the cultural goals and institutionalised means of society. For Durkheim, deregulation led to infinite aspirations; for Merton, infinite aspirations led to deregulation. The result, for both, was the same: high rates of deviation. (Downes Rock, 2007:99) Merton forms a schema of the four different types of deviance and how they accept or reject the goal and how they view the means to achieve that goal: The Conformant: Individuals whom maintain allegiance o both goals and means, despite the trials and tribulations they may face. The Innovator: embraces the cultural goals with rejecting the prescribed means to realise the goal. They resort to what they feel are more efficient means of achieving that goal by embezzlement for e xample. The Ritualist: ignores the cultural goals however sticks by the means to achieve the goal. They feel resigned to their routine and like to play it safe, being stuck in a dead end Job for example. The Retreatist: will naturally reject both cultures goals and means. For instance those who have chosen to engage in ocially unacceptable behaviour such as drug addicts, alcoholics or even freegans (people who do not conform to the notion of consumerism and source their nutrition from societies waste). The Rebel: these individuals actively reject both cultural goals and means and try to substitute them. Individuals such as political revolutionaries or religious fanatics can be seen to be rebellious. Although Merton eventually adapted this depiction of the individual and their tendency towards deviance, his goals versus means schema provides us with an alternative view on ow to comprehend and analyse deviant behaviour other than the regulation of society as suggested by Durkheim. In so far as it illustrates how individuals adapt themselves to fit the situation they are faced with. More importantly Merton presents a concept of anomie that places the emphasis on the strain between the individual and society in which they live, providing us with a more sociological explanation for deviant behaviour as opposed to Durkheims biological theory. Mertons version of anomie was highly regarded for a number of years but met with substantial critique. Durkheim and Merton both stem from the positivist tradition meaning that much of their work was based on empiricism. Furthermore, Mertons statistics and data were taken from police records and often pointed the finger of blame at the lower classes for being the primary source of deviant behaviour. However the data provided was statistics provided are not always going to be neutral, especially if there are police and government targets to reach, suggesting that data may have been manipulated to suit the police. In conjunction with this it is seen as more of a priority to police and aintain the busy, urban inner-city areas whereas the more suburban areas were left to their own devices in a sense, with less police presence and less urgency to respond to incidents of criminality. The statistics in turn reflected this suggesting that deviant individuals were more likely to reside and offend in inner city areas and simply operate within their boundaries as opposed to travelling out with their area to to engage in criminal or deviant behaviour. It is due to these two examples that Mertons statistics were flawed which would then have an impact on the strength of is theory. This paved the way for theorists such as Albert Cohen to expand upon and adapt Mertons original theory.